Academic
Grades falling over two consecutive assessments, a failed mock exam, a growing backlog of late submissions.
Sources · SIS · LMS · teaching staff
Module · Retention
A student who drops out always sends signals first. The agent pulls them together, the human steps in. Retaining costs 5 to 7 times less than recruiting.
Early warning signs · week 12
182 students monitored · 7 at high risk · 14 moderate · 161 OK
Thomas D.
MSc Finance · S2
Sarah B.
MS Marketing · S3
Léo O.
Global MBA · S1
Maya K.
MSc Finance · S2
The agent raises the alert. The decision to intervene remains human: choice of channel, timing and tone.
−50%
dropout within the programme
+€120,000
of revenue protected per student retained, depending on the programme
5 to 7×
ROI of retention vs equivalent recruitment
Retaining a student at risk of dropping out usually costs far less than recruiting a new one, often one of the best ROIs in the student lifecycle. The amounts depend on the remaining fees: to be calibrated on your programme, with no commitment on results.
Early warning signs · week 12
182 students monitored · 7 at high risk · 14 moderate · 161 OK
Thomas D.
MSc Finance · S2
Sarah B.
MS Marketing · S3
Léo O.
Global MBA · S1
Maya K.
MSc Finance · S2
The agent raises the alert. The decision to intervene remains human: choice of channel, timing and tone.
The signals
A student who is dropping out signals it first, across several channels. Taken on its own, each signal is harmless. Combined, they form a pattern a few weeks before the decision.
Grades falling over two consecutive assessments, a failed mock exam, a growing backlog of late submissions.
Sources · SIS · LMS · teaching staff
Class attendance dropping (−25% or more), less frequent LMS log-ins, group participation collapsing.
Sources · Class attendance · LMS · project platform
Isolation from study groups, gradually leaving student channels, missing programme events.
Sources · LMS · NPS survey · teaching staff feedback
A negative pulse NPS survey, a recurring negative tone in exchanges with the agent, doubts expressed about the choice of programme.
Sources · Pulse NPS survey · exchanges with the agent · teaching staff feedback
Housing not confirmed, late payment, an exploratory gap-year request, a grant at risk.
Sources · Registry · payments · grants platform
Handover to a human
The agent never sends a message directly to the student when there is a retention alert. It alerts the most relevant human (configured to your academic organisation), who decides whether to get in touch, how, and in what register.
| Signal detected | Person alerted | Target time |
|---|---|---|
| Acute academic (risk of failure) | Academic tutor | < 48 hours |
| Engagement collapsed | Programme officer | < 5 days |
| Emotional · doubts about the programme | Careers advisor | < 1 week |
| Distress, vulnerability | Head of student wellbeing | < 24 hours, nothing generated by an agent |
| Administrative (visa, housing, funding) | Dedicated student office | < 72 hours |
This mapping is configurable per institution to match your academic organisation chart. Several alerts can go out in parallel (academic + administrative) if needed.
Distress rule
Psychological distress, conflict, harassment, vulnerability, critical financial difficulty: these signals immediately stop any intervention by the agent.
In practice, that means: an immediate alert to the student wellbeing officer, a pause on all agent generation for that profile, no automated message. It is written in the code.
The presumption is that a human must always be first to arrive on these topics.
FAQ Retention
Monitoring set up on a single cohort to measure the impact over 6 months, with no commitment beyond that.