Module · Admissions

Edugent Admissions

The committee starts with the best applications. The conversion rate is worked on one admitted student at a time. The decision remains strictly human.

+3 to 5pts

admitted → enrolled conversion rate

÷ 2

decision time (4 → 2 weeks)

−20 to −30%

withdrawals among admitted students

An illustrative order of magnitude, to be calibrated on your figures: on a premium programme, gaining 4 points of conversion rate on 100 admitted students means 4 additional enrolled students, that is, depending on the programme's fees, substantial additional revenue, without inflating the volume of prospects.

edugent.app · application pile

Application pile · MSc Finance 2026

127 applications · pre-scored on your committee criteria · ready for review

Committee decision 100% human
Y.Z.

Yuxin Z.

MSc Finance · China

Strong essayEligible for an Eiffel ScholarshipRecommendations × 2 received
87/ 100· Premium
A.B.

Aisha B.

MS Marketing · Morocco

Missing transcriptsUndergraduate equivalence to be confirmed
78/ 100· Solid
C.M.

Carlos M.

Global MBA · Brazil

8 years' experienceEntrepreneurial profileAlumni referral
91/ 100· Premium
R.K.

Rohit K.

MSc Finance · India

GMAT pendingGeneric cover letter
64/ 100· To review

The score is a reading aid. The committee remains the sole judge: Article 14 of the AI Act, by design.

What the agent does

Seven capabilities, one logic: saving committee time on the pile

01

Applications that read themselves

Transcripts (all grading systems), essays, reference letters, supporting documents. Multilingual OCR, structured into data comparable criterion by criterion.

02

Your scoring grids, applied without fatigue

The agent applies the committee's criteria, flags premium profiles and ranks the pile. The committee stays in charge and starts from the top.

03

At-risk applications surface in time

An incomplete file, an unusual delay, lost contact, missing transcripts: so many signals to follow up before the applicant drops off.

04

A safety net on transcripts

Checked against known grading systems, inconsistencies spotted (grades, dates, signatures). A safeguard that flags issues without concluding there is fraud.

05

This year's cohort, measured against previous ones

The same criteria applied over a rolling 3–5 years. Each application is compared with the reference cohort, and anomalies surface (exceptional, or below the usual threshold).

06

Admitted students are not lost between the decision and the start of term

Visa, housing, funding, equivalences. The twin guides admitted students in their native language, in the advisor's tone, all the way to the first class.

07

The conversion gap is worked on one admitted student at a time

The agent identifies who is not converting, works out why, and proposes a human intervention at the moment it counts.

How it works · committee prepared

From submission to decision, staying in control

The agent prepares the file the way your best intern would: structured, compared, put in context. The decision remains strictly the committee's. It is explicit, traceable and guaranteed in the code.

  1. 01

    Application received

    Submitted to your CRM. Edugent takes over with no manual intervention.

  2. 02

    OCR & structuring

    Transcripts, essays, references, certificates: structured extraction in a few seconds.

  3. 03

    Scored against your grids

    Your committee criteria applied (academic record, experience, motivation, fit). A traceable, audited score.

  4. 04

    Committee brief prepared (1 page)

    A standardised summary: strengths, points to watch, signals compared across cohorts.

  5. 05

    Human decision★ human step

    The committee remains the sole judge. The agent prepares, the committee decides. AI Act Article 14, by design.

  6. 06

    Notification in the advisor's style

    An offer or rejection letter in the voice of the advisor in charge, signed by them, approved in one click.

Focus on withdrawals

Reducing withdrawals by 20 to 30%

An admitted student who does not enrol is a lost seat, often impossible to fill once the waiting list has run out. Edugent tracks the early warning signs from the moment the offer is sent and orchestrates human intervention at the right time, in the right language.

Typical cycle · admitted → enrolled support

  1. D+1 · Congratulations email + personalised document list

    Visa, housing, funding, equivalences specific to the home country.

  2. D+7 · First check on the warning signs

    Email opened? Document list viewed? Question asked? Silence = a follow-up in the native language.

  3. D+14 · Follow-up draft by the twin

    If the admitted student is still silent, the advisor's twin drafts a targeted follow-up to approve.

  4. D+30 · Mandatory handover to the advisor

    An admitted student still silent at 30 days is always escalated for a personal call.

Under human oversight

The committee keeps the decision. The agent handles the volume.

The AI Act classifies admissions decisions as “high-risk” (Annex III). Edugent Admissions prepares, applies your grids and ranks. The final decision is strictly human.

1

Calibration

The twin learns the advisor's style.

2

Action

The twin drafts replies to prospects, in 4 languages.

3

Oversight

The advisor approves in one click, edits or rejects.

4

Learning

Every correction improves the twin. The style gets sharper.

FAQ Admissions

The real questions from heads of admissions

No, never. The admissions decision is strictly human. It is a requirement of the AI Act (Annex III, high-risk). The agent prepares the file, applies your scoring grids as decision support and flags premium profiles. The committee remains the sole judge.

Try Edugent Admissions on your next cycle

Together we replay your last cycle to calibrate scoring on your past decisions, then switch to the current cycle.